“No other company can realistically get an equivalent license,” said Pamela Samuelson, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley, and co-director of the Berkeley Center for Law and Technology.Critics say that without the orphan books, no competitor will ever be able to compile the comprehensive online library Google intends to create. Without competition, Google will be able to charge universities and others a high price for access to its database.
While most of the critics, including copyright specialists, antitrust scholars and some librarians, agree that the public will benefit, they say others should also have rights to orphan works.
See complete article in the New York Times.